Hypocrisy of the New York Times
US Tax Law permits taxpayers to avoid
taxes within the parameters of the law enacted by Congress. If
it is true that Mr. Trump offset future profits with past tax loss carryforwards,
he is smart in doing so and well within the parameters of the law.
Mr.
Trump has every right to claim tax loss liabilities, if legit and is smart to
do so. He would be a fool if he did not claim these liabilities.
And Donald Trump is no fool.
"The identified $916 million single year
operating income loss is no different than current losses of Amazon, Facebook,
Twitter and a host of other corporations and businesses.
What the New York forgets to mention:
Actually, Donald Trump’s 1995 loss is smaller than the
operating loss the New York Times reported when it sold the Boston Globe in
2013 for a net loss of $1.03 billion.
The Times purchased the Boston Globe in ’93 for $1.1
billion and sold it in 2013 for $70 million, a loss of $1.03 billion. However,
for some reason it’s doubtful the Times will publish their own 2013 tax
returns. That doesn’t meet the political need."
New York Times Publishes Tax Returns of a Private
Citizen, in Shallow Attempt To Assist Hillary Clinton…
Do you want to change something about your appearance? Are you thinking about plastic surgery? If so, you are not alone. Cosmetic surgery is becoming widely used and accepted due to the great results. Keep reading to learn a bit about what plastic surgery could do for you. Find additional information on ReShape Ready- stomach balloon weight loss .
ReplyDeleteWhat bosses normally search for is to check the capabilities, experience and licenses of the occupant as expressed in the CV or prospective employee meet-up, Negligent Hiring being the enormous issue that it has moved toward becoming in human asset operation. www.backgroundreport.com/faq
ReplyDeleteIf you knew who was using these government public criminal records for their benefit, then maybe you could also gain an insight whether or not you could also benefit by using these records. With that in mind, consider who it is that uses these records on a regular basis.http://www.backgroundreport.com/faq
ReplyDeleteI absolutely agree with all that was being said above! So you might be interested in checking this for the reference as well.
ReplyDelete