According to an attorney for the petitioners, Roger Bernstein, arguments are expected to be heard Wednesday Mar. 23 at 1 p.m. in the appellate division of the Third Judicial Department.
Bernstein also noted via email that a Harvard Law professor, Einer Elhauge, has now submitted a brief backing up the argument that Cruz, who was born in Canada but whose mother was an American citizen, does not qualify to be president. The court will decide next Monday whether the friend of the court brief can be taken into account, Bernstein said.
Earlier this month, a state Supreme Court justice dismissed the suit, saying the petitioners had not hit a February deadline to challenge Cruz.
The Republican presidential primary is April 19. The two relevant legal briefs can be read below.
Reply Brief for 3rd Dept. 2016 03 16 - final filed for petitioners-appellants.pdf by Chris Bragg
Reply Brief for 3rd Dept. 2016 03 16 - final filed for petitioners-appellants.pdf by Chris Bragg
Einer
Elhauge, has now submitted a brief backing up the argument that Cruz, who was
born in Canada but whose mother was an American citizen, does not qualify to be
president. The court will decide next Monday whether the friend of the court
brief can be taken into account, Bernstein said. Earlier
this month, a state Supreme Court justice dismissed
the suit, saying the petitioners had not hit a February deadline
to challenge Cruz. https://www.scribd.com/doc/305133999/Reply-Brief-for-3rd-Dept-2016-03-16-final-filed-for-petitioners-appellants-pdf and
Addendum:Read this “white paper” on the Who What When Where Why
and How the “natural born Citizen” term got into the presidential eligibility
clause of our U.S. Constitution: https://www.scribd.com/doc/300919680/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-the-natural-born-Citizen-Term-in-Our-U-S-Constitution
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated, and will appear after approval..Anonymous comments will not be approved.