Ted Cruz and His Shady Campaign Donors Want to Know Every Single Thing About You
by Brendan O'Connor
Via Gawker
Cruz Crew
These
days, almost every presidential candidate has an app that supporters can
download, keeping voters informed (ostensibly) and boosting turnout
(theoretically). But, according to the Associated Press,
none is more invasive than Ted Cruz’s “Cruz Crew” app.
So far,
the app has been downloaded to more than 61,000 devices. Upon registration,
users give the app access to their Facebook accounts—and all the information
contained therein—or else provide a phone number or email address. Users have
to opt-out of agreements to share their contact lists and location with the
campaign.
“Analytics
gives the campaign a roadmap for everything we do,” the campaign’s data and digital
director, Chris Wilson. Cruz, whose parents are mathematicians and data
processing programmers, “has an acute understanding of our work and continually
pushes me on it.” Maybe so, but upon announcing his candidacy, Cruz positioned
himself as an advocate for digital privacy: “Instead of a government that
seizes your emails and your cellphones, imagine a federal government that
protected the privacy rights of every American.”
Federal Election Commission filings show that nearly 93 percent
of the $2.6 million Cambridge Analytica has received in traceable federal
payments has come from committees to which the Mercers donated generously. The
payments — which all came last year and were for polling, micro-targeting,
advertising and other services — came from Cruz’s leadership PAC and
a handful of GOP-aligned big-money organizations, including Ending Spending Action Fund,
former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton’s super PAC and
a pop-up super PAC created to boost 2014 Republican Senate candidates. Other
Cambridge Analytica clients included the campaigns of GOP Sens. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Thom Tillis of North
Carolina, as well as unsuccessful GOP House candidate Art Robinson of Oregon.
The Mercers combined to donate nearly $3.3 million to those groups in 2014,
according to FEC filings.
In
turn, according to the AP, the Cruz campaign paid Cambridge $3.8 million last
year (8 percent of its total spending). Two outside groups supporting the
campaign, meanwhile, have paid Cambridge $682,000 since December. (Mercer had
previously given one of those groups $11 million.) The data the campaign
provides Cambridge with is valuable, too, supplementing its already gargantuan,
10 terabyte database containing information about the 240 million Americans
eligible to vote.
Ted Cruz’s campaign,
ostensibly speaking, has a major leg up on most of the other candidates: An…Read
more
The
idea is to pinpoint something Cambridge calls voters’ “psychographic score.”
From the AP:
Cambridge considers its methodology highly secretive, but it may
include such details as household income, employment status, credit history,
party affiliation, church membership and spending habits. Cambridge uses
powerful computers and proprietary algorithms to predict Americans’ personality
traits.
Cambridge’s database combines government and commercial data
sets such as voter rolls and lists of people who liked certain Facebook posts,
along with consumer data from grocery chains and other clients that can provide
a voter’s preferred brand of toothpaste or whether he clips coupons. In Iowa,
where identifying evangelical voters was key to Cruz’s victory strategy,
Cambridge’s employees scoured the Internet for such useful information as
church membership rolls.
“We’ve
quantified the personalities of every adult American,” Cambridge CEO Alexander
Nix said, describing five basic personality types the firm has determined from
academic research and tens of thousands of monthly questionnaires. (Nix is also
the director of SCL Group, a British consulting firm that
helps incite coups.) “We can reach out and target those different
clusters with messages about the things they care about most, but that have
been nuanced to resonate with their personality type.”
Jerry
Sickles, a paid Cruz field representative in New Hampshire, dismissed the
privacy concerns “It’s not like we’re giving it to the NSA,” he told the AP.
Alice Stewart, a campaign spokeswoman, asked “Why wouldn’t we want to use every
tool available to us to win?”