
(Cordray’s “recess”
appointment during a non-existent recess is one of the constitutional
violations cited in State National Bank of Big Spring
v. Geithner, another court case pending in Washington, D.C. That
case also challenges provisions of the law that created the CFPB, the Dodd-Frank
Act, which Obama signed into law in 2010).
Since Mr. Cordray’s appointment is invalid (he was not appointed
during a recess, nor did the vacancy in his post “happen” during a recess, so
it was not a valid “recess” appointment), his actions as CFPB director likewise
are invalid, null and void. Just as the NLRB’s order was vacated in the Noel
Canning case, so,
too, should the CFPB’s actions (even assuming the agency itself were
constitutional, which itself is questionable given its lack of accountability
to the people’s democratically elected representatives). Lawyers who advise
clients on finance and banking cases have underscored that fact: “The CFPB world has
been turned upside down,” Richard Gottlieb, who heads the financial industry
group at Dykema Gossett Pllc in Chicago, said in an e-mailed statement. “If the
Cordray appointment is void, then so too is every supervisory action and every
new regulation promulgated by the CFPB arising out of newly created bureau
powers.” Source: AP
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated, and will appear after approval..Anonymous comments will not be approved.